lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323150149.GD2125@nanopsycho>
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:01:49 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
        jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 7/7] netdevsim: Add simple FIB resource
 controller via devlink

Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:31:02PM CET, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 3/23/18 12:50 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> +void nsim_devlink_setup(struct netdevsim *ns)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct net *net = dev_net(ns->netdev);
>>> +	bool *reg_devlink = net_generic(net, nsim_devlink_id);
>>> +	struct devlink *devlink;
>>> +	int err = -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	/* only one device per namespace controls devlink */
>>> +	if (!*reg_devlink) {
>>> +		ns->devlink = NULL;
>>> +		return;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	devlink = devlink_alloc(&nsim_devlink_ops, 0);
>>> +	if (!devlink)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	devlink_net_set(devlink, net);
>>> +	err = devlink_register(devlink, &ns->dev);
>> 
>> This reg_devlink construct looks odd. Why don't you leave the devlink
>> instance in init_ns?
>
>It is a per-network namespace resource controller. Since struct devlink

Wait a second. What do you mean by "per-network namespace"? Devlink
instance is always associated with one physical device. Like an ASIC.


>has a net entry, the simplest design is to put it into the namespace of
>the controller. Without it, controlling resource sizes in namespace
>'foobar' has to be done from init_net, which is just wrong.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ