[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1521831180-25014-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:52:56 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/7] igbvf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier
on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
index fa07876..df2283b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void igbvf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igbvf_ring *rx_ring,
* such as IA-64).
*/
wmb();
- writel(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail);
}
}
@@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static inline void igbvf_tx_queue_adv(struct igbvf_adapter *adapter,
tx_ring->buffer_info[first].next_to_watch = tx_desc;
tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
- writel(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + tx_ring->tail);
+ writel_relaxed(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + tx_ring->tail);
/* we need this if more than one processor can write to our tail
* at a time, it synchronizes IO on IA64/Altix systems
*/
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists