[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180323063027.GI2074@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:30:27 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, dsahern@...il.com, vijaya.guvva@...ium.com,
satananda.burla@...ium.com, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
felix.manlunas@...ium.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
sathya.perla@...adcom.com, vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com,
tariqt@...lanox.com, eranbe@...lanox.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 02/12] devlink: extend attrs_set for setting
port flavours
Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 04:36:24AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:55:12 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> enum devlink_attr {
>> /* don't change the order or add anything between, this is ABI! */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_UNSPEC,
>> @@ -224,6 +242,7 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_RESOURCE_ID, /* u64 */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_RESOURCE_UNITS,/* u64 */
>>
>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_FLAVOUR, /* u16 */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_NUMBER, /* u32 */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_SPLIT_SUBPORT_NUMBER, /* u32 */
>
>nit: why is it OK to add the attr in the middle of enum?
Well, I added the next 2 in previous the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists