netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Remove struct bpf_verifier_env argument from print_bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:09:27 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: Remove struct bpf_verifier_env argument from
 print_bpf_insn

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:07:48PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:

SNIP

> >>> +	va_end(args);
> >>> +}
> >>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_verifier_log_write);
> >>> +
> >>> +__printf(2, 3) static void print_ins(void *private_data,
> >>> +				     const char *fmt, ...)
> >>
> >> Unless I am mistaken, you could just call this one "verbose()" and
> >> simply remove the function alias?
> > 
> > right you are ;-) I haven't realized that struct bpf_verifier_env *env
> > will cleanly cast to void * 
> > 
> > new version attached.. I'll make some tests and send full patch
> 
> When you do so, please make sure to send a full fresh series with the two
> patches and also cover letter included, otherwise it's more fragile wrt
> potentially applying the wrong patch from one of the replies. :-)

will do, thanks

jirka