[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180324143100.GA19895@splinter>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 17:31:00 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 19/21] net/ipv6: separate handling of FIB
entries from dst based routes
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:36:20PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> @@ -405,18 +383,9 @@ static void ip6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
> rt->rt6i_idev = NULL;
> in6_dev_put(idev);
> }
> - bucket = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->rt6i_exception_bucket, 1);
> - if (bucket) {
> - rt->rt6i_exception_bucket = NULL;
> - kfree(bucket);
> - }
> -
> - m = rt->fib6_metrics;
> - if (m != &dst_default_metrics && refcount_dec_and_test(&m->refcnt))
> - kfree(m);
You remove this...
>
> rt->from = NULL;
> - dst_release(&from->dst);
> + fib6_info_release(from);
Yet fib6_info_release() doesn't take care of it (unlike the IPv4
equivalent), which means you're leaking the metrics.
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists