[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c80d538-6881-709a-58b9-e0dfb669fac3@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:27:42 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 7/7] netdevsim: Add simple FIB resource
controller via devlink
On 3/25/18 12:35 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:02:45 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile b/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
>>>> index 09388c06171d..449b2a1a1800 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/Makefile
>>>> @@ -9,3 +9,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL),y)
>>>> netdevsim-objs += \
>>>> bpf.o
>>>> endif
>>>> +
>>>> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK),)
>>>
>>> Hm. Don't you need MAY_USE_DEVLINK dependency perhaps?
>>
>> mlxsw uses CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK in its Makefile.
>>
>> MAY_USE_DEVLINK seems to only be used in Kconfig files. Not clear to me
>> why it is needed at all.
>
> NETDEVSIM=y && DEVLINK=m
>
ok. I purposely did not add DEVLINK as a dependency to netdevsim to make
the resource controller truly optional. Can add it if you prefer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists