[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41c26fb3-1082-9105-a5e5-95fd11617160@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:49:22 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 19/21] net/ipv6: separate handling of FIB
entries from dst based routes
On 3/24/18 10:02 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>
>> ok, I'll take a look. I thought I verified both paths (fib6_info and
>> dst) were freeing the metrics.
>
> I get this from kmemleak (applied your patchset on top of fe2d55d295cf):
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88004e2c16c8 (size 96):
> comm "systemd-network", pid 1255, jiffies 4295166424 (age 957.858s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> ip6_route_info_create (/net/ipv6/route.c:2849)
> ip6_route_add (/net/ipv6/route.c:2975)
> inet6_rtm_newroute (/net/ipv6/route.c:4357)
> rtnetlink_rcv_msg (/net/core/rtnetlink.c:4643)
> netlink_rcv_skb (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2445)
> netlink_unicast (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1309 /net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1334)
> netlink_sendmsg (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1897)
> sock_sendmsg (/net/socket.c:630 /net/socket.c:639)
> SYSC_sendto (/net/socket.c:1748)
> do_syscall_64 (/arch/x86/entry/common.c:287)
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:239)
> 0xffffffffffffffff (/./include/asm-generic/sections.h:42)
>
Thanks for confirming. I'll take care of it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists