netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/10] bpf, tracing: introduce bpf raw tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:32:02 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 00/10] bpf, tracing: introduce bpf raw
 tracepoints

On 03/26/2018 05:04 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:28:03 +0200
> Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> 
>>> tracepoint    base  kprobe+bpf tracepoint+bpf raw_tracepoint+bpf
>>> task_rename   1.1M   769K        947K            1.0M
>>> urandom_read  789K   697K        750K            755K  
>>
>> Applied to bpf-next, thanks Alexei!
> 
> Please wait till you have the proper acks. Some of this affects
> tracing.

Ok, I thought time up to v5 was long enough. Anyway, in case there are
objections I can still toss out the series from bpf-next tree worst case
should e.g. follow-up fixups not be appropriate.

Thanks,
Daniel