netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180326.123447.1350791578528691423.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:34:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sh_eth: unify the SoC feature checks

From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:04:53 +0300

> Here's a set of 5 patches against DaveM's 'net-next.git' repo.
> 
> The Ether driver sometimes uses the bit fields in 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data'
> to check which Ether registers exist in a certain SoC and sometimes it uses
> sh_eth_is_{gether|rz_fast_ether}() which basically compares 2 pointers (1 of
> them being constant) -- the latter is definitely not a strongest feature of
> the RISC CPUs (be it SH or ARM), so I decided to get rid of this type of
> the feature checks in favour of the bit fields (I've also made use of a
> 32-bit value and method pointer where appropriate)...

Series applied with patch #4 subject fixed up.

Thank you.