netdev - [net V2 1/8] net/mlx5e: Don't override vport admin link state in switchdev mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180326210505.11007-2-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:04:58 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net V2 1/8] net/mlx5e: Don't override vport admin link state in switchdev mode

From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>

The vport admin original link state will be re-applied after returning
back to legacy mode, it is not right to change the admin link state value
when in switchdev mode.

Use direct vport commands to alter logical vport state in netdev
representor open/close flows rather than the administrative eswitch API.

Fixes: 20a1ea674783 ('net/mlx5e: Support VF vport link state control for SRIOV switchdev mode')
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
index 363d8dcb7f17..0273c233bc85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_open(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
 	struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep = rpriv->rep;
-	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	int err;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
@@ -676,8 +675,9 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_open(struct net_device *dev)
 	if (err)
 		goto unlock;
 
-	if (!mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_state(esw, rep->vport,
-					  MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_UP))
+	if (!mlx5_modify_vport_admin_state(priv->mdev,
+			MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_IN_OP_MOD_ESW_VPORT,
+			rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_UP))
 		netif_carrier_on(dev);
 
 unlock:
@@ -690,11 +690,12 @@ static int mlx5e_rep_close(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
 	struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep = rpriv->rep;
-	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
-	(void)mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_state(esw, rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_DOWN);
+	mlx5_modify_vport_admin_state(priv->mdev,
+			MLX5_QUERY_VPORT_STATE_IN_OP_MOD_ESW_VPORT,
+			rep->vport, MLX5_ESW_VPORT_ADMIN_STATE_DOWN);
 	ret = mlx5e_close_locked(dev);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.14.3