lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326181532.587e9e2b@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:15:32 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, tracing: unbreak lttng

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:08:45 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> wrote:

> for_each_kernel_tracepoint() is used by out-of-tree lttng module
> and therefore cannot be changed.
> Instead introduce kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name() to find
> tracepoint by name.
> 
> Fixes: 9e9afbae6514 ("tracepoint: compute num_args at build time")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

I'm curious, why can't you rebase? The first patch was never acked.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ