netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, tracing: unbreak lttng

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4cdd5f71-38e7-966d-15f8-36833c36182e@fb.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:08:51 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, tracing: unbreak lttng

On 3/26/18 5:08 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:35:56 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com> wrote:
>
>
>>> This patch is not reverting to the old code properly. It introduces a
>>> static inline void function that returns NULL. Please compile-test
>>> with CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=n before submitting a patch involving tracepoints.
>>
>> right. good catch. v2 is coming.
>
> Either fold the patch into the original patch, or I'm pulling in
> Mathieu's patch and pushing it to Linus come the merge window.

Ok. I will fold this patch into previous set and rebase the tree.