netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH iproute2] Drop capabilities if not running ip exec vrf with libcap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180327101519.473a1372@xeon-e3>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:15:19 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com, luto@...capital.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH iproute2] Drop capabilities if not running ip exec
 vrf with libcap

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:24:19 +0100
Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org> wrote:

> ip vrf exec requires root or CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_ADMIN and
> CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE. It is not possible to run unprivileged commands like
> ping as non-root or non-cap-enabled due to this requirement.
> To allow users and administrators to safely add the required
> capabilities to the binary, drop all capabilities on start if not
> invoked with "vrf exec".
> Update the manpage with the requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>

Gets a little messy, but don't have a better answer.
When a command like iproute gets involved in security policy things
I become concerned that it may have unexpected consequences.