netdev - Re: [iproute PATCH 2/3] ss: Put filter DB parsing into a separate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180327114601.62112467@xeon-e3>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:46:01 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH 2/3] ss: Put filter DB parsing into a separate
 function

On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:18:10 +0100
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:

> +#define ENTRY(name, ...) { #name, { __VA_ARGS__, MAX_DB }}

> +		ENTRY(all, UDP_DB, DCCP_DB, TCP_DB, RAW_DB, \
> +			   UNIX_ST_DB, UNIX_DG_DB, UNIX_SQ_DB, \
> +			   PACKET_R_DB, PACKET_DG_DB, NETLINK_DB, \
> +			   SCTP_DB, VSOCK_ST_DB, VSOCK_DG_DB),

Checkpatch complains that line continuations are not necessary here;
and it is right. Macro usage can cross lines.