[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzJLG-E77nFeQJj-CLf-UQAEx3S-=s2-Lws5bBQZN=3GM3zcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:02:15 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 06/14] net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com> wrote:
> Thanks for doing the merge, it looks good to me. One issue below,
> otherwise all my SW tests still pass.
>
> On 03/27/18 02:51 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> - if (ctx->conf == TLS_SW_TX ||
>> - ctx->conf == TLS_SW_RX ||
>> - ctx->conf == TLS_SW_RXTX) {
>> - tls_sw_free_resources(sk);
>> + if (ctx->rx_conf == TLS_SW) {
>> + kfree(ctx->rx.rec_seq);
>> + kfree(ctx->rx.iv);
>> + tls_sw_free_resources_rx(sk);
>> }
>>
>> + if (ctx->tx_conf != TLS_HW)
>> + kfree(ctx);
>
> Looks like this needs to be hidden behind CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE, otherwise
> it doesn't compile if false because TLS_HW is not defined
>
Correct, Will fix.
Thanks Dave !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists