netdev - [PATCH] sfp: allow cotsworks modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:18:25 +0100
From:   Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sfp: allow cotsworks modules

Cotsworks modules fail the checksums - it appears that Cotsworks
reprograms the EEPROM at the end of production with the final product
information (serial, date code, and exact part number for module
options) and fails to update the checksum.

Work around this by detecting the Cotsworks name in the manufacturer
field, and reducing the checksum failures to warnings rather than a
hard error.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 83bf4959b043..4ab6e9a50bbe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp)
 {
 	/* SFP module inserted - read I2C data */
 	struct sfp_eeprom_id id;
+	bool cotsworks;
 	u8 check;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -574,23 +575,43 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 
+	/* Cotsworks do not seem to update the checksums when they
+	 * do the final programming with the final module part number,
+	 * serial number and date code.
+	 */
+	cotsworks = !memcmp(id.base.vendor_name, "COTSWORKS       ", 16);
+
 	/* Validate the checksum over the base structure */
 	check = sfp_check(&id.base, sizeof(id.base) - 1);
 	if (check != id.base.cc_base) {
-		dev_err(sfp->dev,
-			"EEPROM base structure checksum failure: 0x%02x\n",
-			check);
-		print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "sfp EE: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
-			       16, 1, &id, sizeof(id.base) - 1, true);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		if (cotsworks) {
+			dev_warn(sfp->dev,
+				 "EEPROM base structure checksum failure (0x%02x != 0x%02x)\n",
+				 check, id.base.cc_base);
+		} else {
+			dev_err(sfp->dev,
+				"EEPROM base structure checksum failure: 0x%02x != 0x%02x\n",
+				check, id.base.cc_base);
+			print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "sfp EE: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
+				       16, 1, &id, sizeof(id), true);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 
 	check = sfp_check(&id.ext, sizeof(id.ext) - 1);
 	if (check != id.ext.cc_ext) {
-		dev_err(sfp->dev,
-			"EEPROM extended structure checksum failure: 0x%02x\n",
-			check);
-		memset(&id.ext, 0, sizeof(id.ext));
+		if (cotsworks) {
+			dev_warn(sfp->dev,
+				 "EEPROM extended structure checksum failure (0x%02x != 0x%02x)\n",
+				 check, id.ext.cc_ext);
+		} else {
+			dev_err(sfp->dev,
+				"EEPROM extended structure checksum failure: 0x%02x != 0x%02x\n",
+				check, id.ext.cc_ext);
+			print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "sfp EE: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
+				       16, 1, &id, sizeof(id), true);
+			memset(&id.ext, 0, sizeof(id.ext));
+		}
 	}
 
 	sfp->id = id;
-- 
2.7.4