[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a0f6ac2-b13e-b8ad-31b4-a42909a34efa@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:38:48 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 6/9] bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT
On 3/28/18 12:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:05:37 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h
>> @@ -35,4 +35,10 @@ struct tracepoint {
>> struct tracepoint_func __rcu *funcs;
>> };
>>
>> +struct bpf_raw_event_map {
>> + struct tracepoint *tp;
>> + void *bpf_func;
>> + u32 num_args;
>> +} __aligned(32);
>> +
>
> If you prefer v7, I'm fine with that. For cache issues, I can pull out
> the funcs from the tracepoint structure like I posted.
I very much prefer to land this v8 as-is and optimize later.
I still have bpfilter/microkernel patches to finish which were
practically ready two weeks ago and got delayed but this set.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists