netdev - Re: RFC on writel and writel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:04:14 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     okaya@...eaurora.org
Cc:     benh@...nel.crashing.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        alexander.duyck@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, arnd@...db.de,
        jgg@...pe.ca, David.Laight@...lab.com, oohall@...il.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linus971@...il.com
Subject: Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed

From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:56:01 -0400

> sparc		question sent

Sparc never lets physical memory accesses pass MMIO, and vice versa.

They are always strongly ordered amongst eachother.

Therefore no explicit barrier instructions are necessary.