[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tvsz3cqz.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:13:24 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] rhashtable: allow a walk of the hash table without missing objects.
On Thu, Mar 29 2018, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> How about storing the hash chains in order by object address?
> Then rhashtable_walk_start() can easily find it's place regardless of
> whether the old object was still present or not, using <= on the
> address.
> "Insert" would need to record an insert location and insert there rather
> than at the head of the chain.
> I might try coding that.
Unfortunately rhltables make this approach unworkable.
However while trying to write the code I found a bug :-(
I'll post a patch for the bug, and a patch to transparently make the
current interface more reliable when the caller keeps the current
object in the table.
I think this is sufficient for all current use-cases.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists