[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180329072549.2880-5-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:25:49 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfrm_policy: use true and false for boolean values
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Assign true or false to boolean variables instead of an integer value.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 12bd415d349e..2b7babb66175 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ static void xfrm_pcpu_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
void xfrm_policy_cache_flush(void)
{
struct xfrm_dst *old;
- bool found = 0;
+ bool found = false;
int cpu;
might_sleep();
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists