[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180329072549.2880-4-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:25:48 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] esp: check the NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM bit before segmenting
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
If I understand correctly, we should not be asking for a
checksum offload on an ipsec packet if the netdev isn't
advertising NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM. In that case, we should
clear the NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK bits.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c | 2 ++
net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c b/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
index da5635fc52c2..7cf755ef9efb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c
@@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *esp4_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || !x->xso.offload_handle ||
(x->xso.dev != skb->dev))
esp_features = features & ~(NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK);
+ else if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM))
+ esp_features = features & ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
xo->flags |= XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c b/net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c
index 3fd1ec775dc2..27f59b61f70f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c
@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *esp6_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) || !x->xso.offload_handle ||
(x->xso.dev != skb->dev))
esp_features = features & ~(NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK);
+ else if (!(features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM))
+ esp_features = features & ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
xo->flags |= XFRM_GSO_SEGMENT;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists