netdev - [PATCH 10/47] netfilter: x_tables: enforce unique and ascending entry points

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180330113914.18431-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:38:37 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/47] netfilter: x_tables: enforce unique and ascending entry points

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

Harmless from kernel point of view, but iptables assumes that this is
true when decoding a ruleset.

iptables walks the dumped blob from kernel, and, for each entry that
creates a new chain it prints out rule/chain information.
Base chains (hook entry points) are thus only shown when they appear
in the rule blob.  One base chain that is referenced multiple times
in hook blob is then only printed once.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
index 5d8ba89a8da8..4e6cbb38e616 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
@@ -529,10 +529,15 @@ static int xt_check_entry_match(const char *match, const char *target,
  */
 int xt_check_table_hooks(const struct xt_table_info *info, unsigned int valid_hooks)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
+	const char *err = "unsorted underflow";
+	unsigned int i, max_uflow, max_entry;
+	bool check_hooks = false;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(info->hook_entry) != ARRAY_SIZE(info->underflow));
 
+	max_entry = 0;
+	max_uflow = 0;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(info->hook_entry); i++) {
 		if (!(valid_hooks & (1 << i)))
 			continue;
@@ -541,9 +546,33 @@ int xt_check_table_hooks(const struct xt_table_info *info, unsigned int valid_ho
 			return -EINVAL;
 		if (info->underflow[i] == 0xFFFFFFFF)
 			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (check_hooks) {
+			if (max_uflow > info->underflow[i])
+				goto error;
+
+			if (max_uflow == info->underflow[i]) {
+				err = "duplicate underflow";
+				goto error;
+			}
+			if (max_entry > info->hook_entry[i]) {
+				err = "unsorted entry";
+				goto error;
+			}
+			if (max_entry == info->hook_entry[i]) {
+				err = "duplicate entry";
+				goto error;
+			}
+		}
+		max_entry = info->hook_entry[i];
+		max_uflow = info->underflow[i];
+		check_hooks = true;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+error:
+	pr_err_ratelimited("%s at hook %d\n", err, i);
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_check_table_hooks);
 
-- 
2.11.0