lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:02:48 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: Refactor RQ XDP_TX indication

From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>

Make the xdp_xmit indication available for Striding RQ
by taking it out of the type-specific union.
This refactor is a preparation for a downstream patch that
adds XDP support over Striding RQ.
In addition, use a bitmap instead of a boolean for possible
future flags.

Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h    | 6 +++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h
index d26dd4bc89f4..a6ca54393bb6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h
@@ -479,6 +479,10 @@ typedef struct sk_buff *
 typedef bool (*mlx5e_fp_post_rx_wqes)(struct mlx5e_rq *rq);
 typedef void (*mlx5e_fp_dealloc_wqe)(struct mlx5e_rq*, u16);
 
+enum mlx5e_rq_flag {
+	MLX5E_RQ_FLAG_XDP_XMIT = BIT(0),
+};
+
 struct mlx5e_rq {
 	/* data path */
 	struct mlx5_wq_ll      wq;
@@ -489,7 +493,6 @@ struct mlx5e_rq {
 			u32 frag_sz;	/* max possible skb frag_sz */
 			union {
 				bool page_reuse;
-				bool xdp_xmit;
 			};
 		} wqe;
 		struct {
@@ -528,6 +531,7 @@ struct mlx5e_rq {
 	struct bpf_prog       *xdp_prog;
 	unsigned int           hw_mtu;
 	struct mlx5e_xdpsq     xdpsq;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, 8);
 
 	/* control */
 	struct mlx5_wq_ctrl    wq_ctrl;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
index 07db8a58d0a2..a827571deb85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ static inline bool mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame(struct mlx5e_rq *rq,
 	/* move page to reference to sq responsibility,
 	 * and mark so it's not put back in page-cache.
 	 */
-	rq->wqe.xdp_xmit = true;
+	__set_bit(MLX5E_RQ_FLAG_XDP_XMIT, rq->flags); /* non-atomic */
 	sq->db.di[pi] = *di;
 	sq->pc++;
 
@@ -913,9 +913,8 @@ void mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe)
 	skb = skb_from_cqe(rq, cqe, wi, cqe_bcnt);
 	if (!skb) {
 		/* probably for XDP */
-		if (rq->wqe.xdp_xmit) {
+		if (__test_and_clear_bit(MLX5E_RQ_FLAG_XDP_XMIT, rq->flags)) {
 			wi->di.page = NULL;
-			rq->wqe.xdp_xmit = false;
 			/* do not return page to cache, it will be returned on XDP_TX completion */
 			goto wq_ll_pop;
 		}
@@ -955,9 +954,8 @@ void mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_rep(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe)
 
 	skb = skb_from_cqe(rq, cqe, wi, cqe_bcnt);
 	if (!skb) {
-		if (rq->wqe.xdp_xmit) {
+		if (__test_and_clear_bit(MLX5E_RQ_FLAG_XDP_XMIT, rq->flags)) {
 			wi->di.page = NULL;
-			rq->wqe.xdp_xmit = false;
 			/* do not return page to cache, it will be returned on XDP_TX completion */
 			goto wq_ll_pop;
 		}
-- 
2.14.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ