[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180331000252.30480-9-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:02:45 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5e: Do not busy-wait for UMR completion in Striding RQ
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Do not busy-wait a pending UMR completion. Under high HW load,
busy-waiting a delayed completion would fully utilize the CPU core
and mistakenly indicate a SW bottleneck.
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
index 8aa94d3cff59..8eb9e7e89b09 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ bool mlx5e_post_rx_mpwqes(struct mlx5e_rq *rq)
if (!rq->mpwqe.umr_in_progress)
mlx5e_alloc_rx_mpwqe(rq, wq->head);
- return true;
+ return false;
}
static void mlx5e_lro_update_tcp_hdr(struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe, struct tcphdr *tcp)
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists