[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c813e2db-af27-a540-0609-bc7d90ce4378@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 07:51:36 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Lebrun <dav.lebrun@...il.com>,
Mathieu Xhonneux <m.xhonneux@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Lebrun <dlebrun@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] ipv6: sr: introduce seg6local End.BPF
action
On 04/03/2018 07:25 AM, David Lebrun wrote:
>
> What about saving and restoring the IPv6 CB, similarly to what TCP does with tcp_v6_restore_cb() ?
Note that TCP only moves IPCB around in skb->cb[] for cache locality gains.
Now we switched to rb-tree for out-of-order queue, these gains might be marginal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists