netdev - Re: [virtio-dev] [pci PATCH v7 2/5] virtio_pci: Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV on virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0927465E-0B56-4903-9F5E-288A7D9C46E6@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:18:23 +0000
From:   "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        "Daly, Dan" <dan.daly@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org" <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
        kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "netanel@...zon.com" <netanel@...zon.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
        Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@...zon.de>,
        "Wang, Liang-min" <liang-min.wang@...el.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "dwmw@...zon.co.uk" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [pci PATCH v7 2/5] virtio_pci: Add support for
 unmanaged SR-IOV on virtio_pci devices

On Apr 3, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:

>> I'm not sure why you would need a feature bit. The capability is
>> controlled via PCI configuration space. If it is present the device
>> has the capability. If it is not then it does not.
>>
>> Basically if the PCI configuration space is not present then the sysfs
>> entries will not be spawned and nothing will attempt to use this
>> function.
>>
>> - ALex
>
> It's about compability with older guests which ignore the
> capability.
>
> The feature is thus helpful so host knows whether guest supports VFs.

This is not about a guest creating its own VFs. This is about a host PF  
that happens to have a virtio interface to be able to create virtio VFs  
that can be assigned to guests. Nothing changes at all from a guest  
perspective. Or maybe I am not understanding what you mean by "whether  
guest supports VFs".

--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (874 bytes)