[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49522d96-9bd6-adcb-4835-1a168ec0f61c@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:51:08 +0100
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jj@...ra.linux.cz>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Tim Hockin" <thockin@....com>,
Eli Kupermann <eli.kupermann@...el.com>,
"Chris Leech" <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
Scott Feldman <scott.feldman@...el.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's
Hi Andrew,
On 06-04-2018 15:47, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:51:15PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for
>>>> driver private ioctl's in ethtool.
>>>>
>>>> Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of
>>>> features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two
>>>> examples: One of the most recent one is the safety features,
>>>> which can be enabled/disabled and forced at runtime.
> Hi Jose
>
> Is there a reason somebody would decide to use the Ethernet in
> 'unsafe' mode? Cannot you just turn it on by default?
Yes, its already on by default. I was just trying to give an
example of an user-reconfigurable feature, maybe it was not the
best one :)
Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists