[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C82598F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 02:19:27 +0000
From: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To: "Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sanchez-Palencia, Jesus" <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support
for adding offloaded clsflower filters
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org] On
> Behalf Of Vinicius Costa Gomes
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:08 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Sanchez-Palencia, Jesus <jesus.sanchez-
> palencia@...el.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v6 10/10] igb: Add support for
> adding offloaded clsflower filters
>
> This allows filters added by tc-flower and specifying MAC addresses,
> Ethernet types, and the VLAN priority field, to be offloaded to the
> controller.
Can I get a brief explanation for enabling this? I'm currently happy with this patch series from a regression perspective, but am personally a bit, umm, challenged with tc in general but would like to run it through the paces a bit. If it can be done in a one or two liner I think it would be a good addition to the patch description.
>
> This reuses most of the infrastructure used by ethtool, but clsflower
> filters are kept in a separated list, so they are invisible to
> ethtool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 2 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 188
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists