lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:32:07 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: loseweigh@...il.com Cc: dsahern@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, si-wei.liu@...cle.com, mst@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, kubakici@...pl, jasowang@...hat.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh@...il.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special attributes, mark them as such and the tools base their actions upon that. "Hiding", or changing classes, doesn't make any sense to me still.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists