[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180408192952.GB685@sol.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 12:29:52 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: syzbot
<syzbot+79de6f09efc55fec084b706de3c91e9457433ac5@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dccp@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage at ./include/net/inet_sock.h:LINE
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 05:45:00PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> syzkaller has found reproducer for the following crash on
> fba961ab29e5ffb055592442808bb0f7962e05da
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/master
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
> .config is attached
> Raw console output is attached.
> C reproducer is attached
> syzkaller reproducer is attached. See https://goo.gl/kgGztJ
> for information about syzkaller reproducers
>
>
> Can not set IPV6_FL_F_REFLECT if flowlabel_consistency sysctl is enable
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 4.15.0-rc4+ #164 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> ./include/net/inet_sock.h:136 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by syzkaller667189/5780:
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}, at: [<000000008d7d4e62>] lock_sock
> include/net/sock.h:1462 [inline]
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}, at: [<000000008d7d4e62>]
> do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.9+0x23d/0x38f0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:167
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 5780 Comm: syzkaller667189 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc4+ #164
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
> Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x123/0x170 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4585
> ireq_opt_deref include/net/inet_sock.h:135 [inline]
> inet_csk_route_req+0x824/0xca0 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:544
> dccp_v4_send_response+0xa7/0x640 net/dccp/ipv4.c:485
> dccp_v4_conn_request+0x9ee/0x11b0 net/dccp/ipv4.c:633
> dccp_v6_conn_request+0xd30/0x1350 net/dccp/ipv6.c:317
> dccp_rcv_state_process+0x574/0x1620 net/dccp/input.c:612
> dccp_v4_do_rcv+0xeb/0x160 net/dccp/ipv4.c:682
> dccp_v6_do_rcv+0x81a/0x9b0 net/dccp/ipv6.c:578
> sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:907 [inline]
> __release_sock+0x124/0x360 net/core/sock.c:2274
> release_sock+0xa4/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:2789
> do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.9+0x50f/0x38f0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:898
> ipv6_setsockopt+0xd7/0x150 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:922
> dccp_setsockopt+0x85/0xd0 net/dccp/proto.c:573
> sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2978
> SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1821 [inline]
> SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1800
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96
> RIP: 0033:0x445ec9
> RSP: 002b:00007fa001b58db8 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dbc24 RCX: 0000000000445ec9
> RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000000000029 RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00000000006dbc20 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 000000002030a000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007fff809eec1f R14: 00007fa001b599c0 R15: 0000000000000001
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 4.15.0-rc4+ #164 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> ./include/net/inet_sock.h:136 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by syzkaller667189/5780:
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}, at: [<000000008d7d4e62>] lock_sock
> include/net/sock.h:1462 [inline]
> #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}, at: [<000000008d7d4e62>]
> do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.9+0x23d/0x38f0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:167
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 5780 Comm: syzkaller667189 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc4+ #164
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
> Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x123/0x170 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4585
> ireq_opt_deref include/net/inet_sock.h:135 [inline]
> dccp_v4_send_response+0x4b0/0x640 net/dccp/ipv4.c:496
> dccp_v4_conn_request+0x9ee/0x11b0 net/dccp/ipv4.c:633
> dccp_v6_conn_request+0xd30/0x1350 net/dccp/ipv6.c:317
> dccp_rcv_state_process+0x574/0x1620 net/dccp/input.c:612
> dccp_v4_do_rcv+0xeb/0x160 net/dccp/ipv4.c:682
> dccp_v6_do_rcv+0x81a/0x9b0 net/dccp/ipv6.c:578
> sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:907 [inline]
> __release_sock+0x124/0x360 net/core/sock.c:2274
> release_sock+0xa4/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:2789
> do_ipv6_setsockopt.isra.9+0x50f/0x38f0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:898
> ipv6_setsockopt+0xd7/0x150 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:922
> dccp_setsockopt+0x85/0xd0 net/dccp/proto.c:573
> sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2978
> SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1821 [inline]
> SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1800
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96
> RIP: 0033:0x445ec9
> RSP: 002b:00007fa001b58db8 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dbc24 RCX: 0000000000445ec9
> RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000000000029 RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00000000006dbc20 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 000000002030a000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007fff809eec1f R14: 00007fa001b599c0 R15: 0000000000000001
syzbot stopped hitting this for some reason, but the bug is still there.
Here's a simplified reproducer that works on Linus' tree as of today:
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main()
{
int is_parent = (fork() != 0);
for (;;) {
int fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DCCP, 0);
struct sockaddr_in addr = {
.sin_family = AF_INET,
.sin_port = htobe16(0x4e23),
};
if (is_parent) {
connect(fd, (void *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
} else {
bind(fd, (void *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
listen(fd, 100);
setsockopt(fd, 0, 0xFFFF, NULL, 0);
}
close(fd);
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists