netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: Enable interrupt function on LED2 pin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 03:37:29 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
        Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal@...il.com>,
        Esben Haabendal <eha@...f.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Esben Haabendal <eha@...f.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: Enable interrupt function on LED2 pin

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 7.3040)

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.16, v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126.

v4.16: Build OK!
v4.15.15: Build failed! Errors:
    drivers/net/phy/marvell.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘phy_modify’; did you mean ‘pmd_modify’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

v4.14.32: Build failed! Errors:
    drivers/net/phy/marvell.c:472:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘phy_modify’; did you mean ‘pmd_modify’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

v4.9.92: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    864dc729d528 ("net: phy: marvell: Refactor m88e1121 RGMII delay configuration")

v4.4.126: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    864dc729d528 ("net: phy: marvell: Refactor m88e1121 RGMII delay configuration")


Please let us know if you'd like to have this patch included in a stable tree.

--
Thanks,
Sasha