[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523283035-25639-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 22:10:35 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kafai@...com, weiwan@...gle.com,
dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, johannes.berg@...el.com, fw@...len.de
Cc: linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: decnet: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dn_route_init
dn_route_init() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at dn_route_init() is:
[1] dn_route_init() <- decnet_init()
decnet_init() is only set as a parameter of module_init().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dn_route_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL,
to avoid busy waiting and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
net/decnet/dn_route.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index 0bd3afd..59ed12a 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ void __init dn_route_init(void)
while(dn_rt_hash_mask & (dn_rt_hash_mask - 1))
dn_rt_hash_mask--;
dn_rt_hash_table = (struct dn_rt_hash_bucket *)
- __get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, order);
+ __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order);
} while (dn_rt_hash_table == NULL && --order > 0);
if (!dn_rt_hash_table)
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists