netdev - [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180410052630.11270-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:26:29 +0800
From:   Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, mst@...hat.com,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check

Commit d65026c6c62e7d9616c8ceb5a53b68bcdc050525 ("vhost: validate log
when IOTLB is enabled") introduced a regression.  The logic was
originally:

  if (vq->iotlb)
      return 1;
  return A && B;

After the patch the short-circuit logic for A was inverted:

  if (A || vq->iotlb)
      return A;
  return B;

This patch fixes the regression by rewriting the checks in the obvious
way, no longer returning A when vq->iotlb is non-NULL (which is hard to
understand).

Reported-by: syzbot+65a84dde0214b0387ccd@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 5320039671b7..93fd0c75b0d8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -1244,10 +1244,12 @@ static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
 int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
 {
-	int ret = vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base);
+	if (!vq_log_access_ok(vq, vq->log_base))
+		return 0;
 
-	if (ret || vq->iotlb)
-		return ret;
+	/* Access validation occurs at prefetch time with IOTLB */
+	if (vq->iotlb)
+		return 1;
 
 	return vq_access_ok(vq, vq->num, vq->desc, vq->avail, vq->used);
 }
-- 
2.14.3