lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc489498-4517-9528-822a-f5edb5a132ad@netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:54:27 +0100
From:   Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/5] bpf/verifier: use call graph to
 efficiently check max stack depth

On 06/04/2018 18:14, Edward Cree wrote:
<snip>
> Since that algorithm selects
> + * nodes in the order of the sorted output, we can do our processing in the loop
> + * that does the tsort, rather than storing the sorted list and then having a
> + * second loop to iterate over it and compute the total_stack_depth values.
>   */

IMO, seperate the sort from depth calculation is better than combining
them. The tsort of call graph could potentially be used in other places.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ