[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180411.105528.2200336972660597076.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:55:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mst@...hat.com
Cc: stefanha@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] vhost: fix vhost_vq_access_ok() log check
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:24:02 +0300
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> v3:
>> * Rebased onto net/master and resolved conflict [DaveM]
>>
>> v2:
>> * Rewrote the conditional to make the vq access check clearer [Linus]
>> * Added Patch 2 to make the return type consistent and harder to misuse [Linus]
>>
>> The first patch fixes the vhost virtqueue access check which was recently
>> broken. The second patch replaces the int return type with bool to prevent
>> future bugs.
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>
> We need the 1st one on stable I think.
Series applied and patch #1 queued up for -stable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists