lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411114303.6f927c45@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:43:14 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To:     Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/6] bnxt_en: do not allow wildcard matches for
 L2 flows

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:50:14 -0400, Michael Chan wrote:
> @@ -764,6 +788,41 @@ static bool bnxt_tc_can_offload(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_tc_flow *flow)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Currently source/dest MAC cannot be partial wildcard  */
> +	if (bits_set(&flow->l2_key.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_key.smac)) &&
> +	    !is_exactmatch(flow->l2_mask.smac, sizeof(flow->l2_mask.smac))) {
> +		netdev_info(bp->dev, "Wildcard match unsupported for Source MAC\n");

This wouldn't be something to do in net, but how do you feel about
using extack for messages like this?

> +		return false;
> +	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ