[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411121759.4191e267@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:17:59 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf: add documentation for eBPF helpers
(58-64)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:41:57 +0100
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 7343af4196c8..db090ad03626 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1250,6 +1250,51 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * Return
> * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure.
> *
> + * int bpf_redirect_map(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key, u64 flags)
> + * Description
> + * Redirect the packet to the endpoint referenced by *map* at
> + * index *key*. Depending on its type, his *map* can contain
> + * references to net devices (for forwarding packets through other
> + * ports), or to CPUs (for redirecting XDP frames to another CPU;
> + * but this is not fully implemented as of this writing).
Stating that CPUMAP redirect "is not fully implemented" is confusing.
The issue is that CPUMAP only works for "native" XDP.
What about saying:
"[...] or to CPUs (for redirecting XDP frames to another CPU;
but this is only implemented for native XDP as of this writing)"
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists