netdev - [PATCH net] sctp: do not check port in sctp_inet6_cmp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <340aad3be762046ca9d02e54edba5bfefa2f4e71.1523451485.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:58:05 +0800
From:   Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: do not check port in sctp_inet6_cmp_addr

pf->cmp_addr() is called before binding a v6 address to the sock. It
should not check ports, like in sctp_inet_cmp_addr.

But sctp_inet6_cmp_addr checks the addr by invoking af(6)->cmp_addr,
sctp_v6_cmp_addr where it also compares the ports.

This would cause that setsockopt(SCTP_SOCKOPT_BINDX_ADD) could bind
multiple duplicated IPv6 addresses after Commit 40b4f0fd74e4 ("sctp:
lack the check for ports in sctp_v6_cmp_addr").

This patch is to remove af->cmp_addr called in sctp_inet6_cmp_addr,
but do the proper check for both v6 addrs and v4mapped addrs.

Fixes: 40b4f0fd74e4 ("sctp: lack the check for ports in sctp_v6_cmp_addr")
Reported-by: Jianwen Ji <jiji@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
 net/sctp/ipv6.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index f1fc48e..be4b72c 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -846,8 +846,8 @@ static int sctp_inet6_cmp_addr(const union sctp_addr *addr1,
 			       const union sctp_addr *addr2,
 			       struct sctp_sock *opt)
 {
-	struct sctp_af *af1, *af2;
 	struct sock *sk = sctp_opt2sk(opt);
+	struct sctp_af *af1, *af2;
 
 	af1 = sctp_get_af_specific(addr1->sa.sa_family);
 	af2 = sctp_get_af_specific(addr2->sa.sa_family);
@@ -863,10 +863,31 @@ static int sctp_inet6_cmp_addr(const union sctp_addr *addr1,
 	if (sctp_is_any(sk, addr1) || sctp_is_any(sk, addr2))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (addr1->sa.sa_family != addr2->sa.sa_family)
+	if (addr1->sa.sa_family != addr2->sa.sa_family) {
+		if (addr1->sa.sa_family == AF_INET &&
+		    addr2->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6 &&
+		    ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr2->v6.sin6_addr))
+			if (addr2->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] ==
+			    addr1->v4.sin_addr.s_addr)
+				return 1;
+		if (addr2->sa.sa_family == AF_INET &&
+		    addr1->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6 &&
+		    ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&addr1->v6.sin6_addr))
+			if (addr1->v6.sin6_addr.s6_addr32[3] ==
+			    addr2->v4.sin_addr.s_addr)
+				return 1;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&addr1->v6.sin6_addr, &addr2->v6.sin6_addr))
+		return 0;
+
+	if ((ipv6_addr_type(&addr1->v6.sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) &&
+	    addr1->v6.sin6_scope_id && addr2->v6.sin6_scope_id &&
+	    addr1->v6.sin6_scope_id != addr2->v6.sin6_scope_id)
 		return 0;
 
-	return af1->cmp_addr(addr1, addr2);
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /* Verify that the provided sockaddr looks bindable.   Common verification,
-- 
2.1.0