netdev - [bpf PATCH 2/3] bpf: sockmap, sk_wait_event needed to handle blocking cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:56:20 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf PATCH 2/3] bpf: sockmap,
 sk_wait_event needed to handle blocking cases

In the recvmsg handler we need to add a wait event to support the
blocking use cases. Without this we return zero and may confuse
user applications. In the wait event any data received on the
sk either via sk_receive_queue or the psock ingress list will
wake up the sock.

Fixes: fa246693a111 ("bpf: sockmap, BPF_F_INGRESS flag for BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/sockmap.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
index cef187f..ffe266b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include <net/tcp.h>
 #include <linux/ptr_ring.h>
 #include <net/inet_common.h>
+#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
 
 #define SOCK_CREATE_FLAG_MASK \
 	(BPF_F_NUMA_NODE | BPF_F_RDONLY | BPF_F_WRONLY)
@@ -732,6 +733,26 @@ static int bpf_exec_tx_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int bpf_wait_data(struct sock *sk,
+			 struct smap_psock *psk, int flags,
+			 long timeo, int *err)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+
+	add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
+	sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
+	rc = sk_wait_event(sk, &timeo,
+			   !list_empty(&psk->ingress) ||
+			   !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue),
+			   &wait);
+	sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk);
+	remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static int bpf_tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 			   int nonblock, int flags, int *addr_len)
 {
@@ -755,6 +776,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		return tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, nonblock, flags, addr_len);
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
+bytes_ready:
 	while (copied != len) {
 		struct scatterlist *sg;
 		struct sk_msg_buff *md;
@@ -809,6 +831,29 @@ static int bpf_tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!copied) {
+		long timeo;
+		int data;
+		int err = 0;
+
+		timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, nonblock);
+		data = bpf_wait_data(sk, psock, flags, timeo, &err);
+
+		if (data) {
+			if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
+				release_sock(sk);
+				smap_release_sock(psock, sk);
+				copied = tcp_recvmsg(sk, msg, len,
+						     nonblock, flags, addr_len);
+				return copied;
+			}
+			goto bytes_ready;
+		}
+
+		if (err)
+			copied = err;
+	}
+
 	release_sock(sk);
 	smap_release_sock(psock, sk);
 	return copied;