netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Document the DT bindings for lan78xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:17:25 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>
Cc:     Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Document the DT bindings for lan78xx

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 03:10:57PM +0100, Phil Elwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On 12/04/2018 15:04, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:55:36PM +0100, Phil Elwell wrote:
> >> The Microchip LAN78XX family of devices are Ethernet controllers with
> >> a USB interface. Despite being discoverable devices it can be useful to
> >> be able to configure them from Device Tree, particularly in low-cost
> >> applications without an EEPROM or programmed OTP.
> >>
> >> Document the supported properties in a bindings file, adding it to
> >> MAINTAINERS at the same time.
> > 
> > Hi Phil
> > 
> > How you link an OF node to a USB device is not obvious. Could you
> > please include either a pointer to some binding documentation, or make
> > your example show it.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. Would you consider this (lifted from the Pi 3B+ Device Tree)
> a sufficient example?

Yes, this is good.

Thanks
     Andrew