[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50bd418e-9f26-5d4f-f4bf-6355f08b22e1@raspberrypi.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:30:28 +0100
From: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] lan78xx: Read LED modes from Device Tree
Hi Andrew,
On 12/04/2018 15:26, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Phil Elwell wrote:
>> Add support for DT property "microchip,led-modes", a vector of two
>> cells (u32s) in the range 0-15, each of which sets the mode for one
>> of the two LEDs. Some possible values are:
>>
>> 0=link/activity 1=link1000/activity
>> 2=link100/activity 3=link10/activity
>> 4=link100/1000/activity 5=link10/1000/activity
>> 6=link10/100/activity 14=off 15=on
>>
>> Also use the presence of the DT property to indicate that the
>> LEDs should be enabled - necessary in the event that no valid OTP
>> or EEPROM is available.
>
> I'm not a fan of this, but at the moment, we don't have anything
> better.
>
> Please follow what mscc does, add a header file for the LED settings.
Good idea.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> index d98397b..ffb483d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
>> @@ -2008,6 +2008,7 @@ static int lan78xx_phy_init(struct lan78xx_net *dev)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> u32 mii_adv;
>> + u32 led_modes[2];
>> struct phy_device *phydev;
>>
>> phydev = phy_find_first(dev->mdiobus);
>> @@ -2097,6 +2098,25 @@ static int lan78xx_phy_init(struct lan78xx_net *dev)
>> (void)lan78xx_set_eee(dev->net, &edata);
>> }
>>
>> + if (!of_property_read_u32_array(dev->udev->dev.of_node,
>> + "microchip,led-modes",
>> + led_modes, ARRAY_SIZE(led_modes))) {
>> + u32 reg;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + reg = phy_read(phydev, 0x1d);
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(led_modes); i++) {
>> + reg &= ~(0xf << (i * 4));
>> + reg |= (led_modes[i] & 0xf) << (i * 4);
>> + }
>
> Please add range checks for led_modes[i] and return -EINVAL if the
> check fails.
Will do.
Thanks,
Phil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists