[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b28c0198-a587-8d88-7ae4-88bd2a5e82fa@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 19:17:49 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net 2/3] sfc: pass the correctly bogus filter_id to
rps_may_expire_flow()
When we inserted an ARFS filter for ndo_rx_flow_steer(), we didn't know
what the filter ID would be, so we just returned 0. Thus, we must also
pass 0 as the filter ID when calling rps_may_expire_flow() for it, and
rely on the flow_id to identify what we're talking about.
Fixes: 3af0f34290f6 ("sfc: replace asynchronous filter operations")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 3 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
index 50daad0a1482..36f24c7e553a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -4776,8 +4776,7 @@ static bool efx_ef10_filter_rfs_expire_one(struct efx_nic *efx, u32 flow_id,
goto out_unlock;
}
- if (!rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, spec->dmaq_id,
- flow_id, filter_idx)) {
+ if (!rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, spec->dmaq_id, flow_id, 0)) {
ret = false;
goto out_unlock;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
index 4a19c7efdf8d..7174ef5e5c5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
@@ -2912,7 +2912,7 @@ bool efx_farch_filter_rfs_expire_one(struct efx_nic *efx, u32 flow_id,
if (test_bit(index, table->used_bitmap) &&
table->spec[index].priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_HINT &&
rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, table->spec[index].dmaq_id,
- flow_id, index)) {
+ flow_id, 0)) {
efx_farch_filter_table_clear_entry(efx, table, index);
ret = true;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists