netdev - Re: linux-next on x60: network manager often complains "network is disabled" after resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 Apr 2018 18:16:04 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc:     Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next on x60: network manager often complains "network is
 disabled" after resume

On Mon 2018-03-26 10:33:55, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 08:19 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Ok, what does 'nmcli dev' and 'nmcli radio' show?
> > > > 
> > > > Broken state.
> > > > 
> > > > pavel@amd:~$ nmcli dev
> > > > DEVICE  TYPE      STATE        CONNECTION
> > > > eth1    ethernet  unavailable  --
> > > > lo      loopback  unmanaged    --
> > > > wlan0   wifi      unmanaged    --
> > > 
> > > If the state is "unmanaged" on resume, that would indicate a
> > > problem
> > > with sleep/wake and likely not a kernel network device issue.
> > > 
> > > We should probably move this discussion to the NM lists to debug
> > > further.  Before you suspend, run "nmcli gen log level trace" to
> > > turn
> > > on full debug logging, then reproduce the issue, and send a pointer
> > > to
> > > those logs (scrubbed for anything you consider sensitive) to the NM
> > > mailing list.
> > 
> > Hmm :-)
> > 
> > root@amd:/data/pavel# nmcli gen log level trace
> > Error: Unknown log level 'trace'
> 
> What NM version?  'trace' is pretty old (since 1.0 from December 2014)
> so unless you're using a really, really old version of Debian I'd
> expect you'd have it.  Anyway, debug would do.

Hmm.

pavel@duo:~$ /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --version
You must be root to run NetworkManager!
pavel@duo:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --version
0.9.10.0

So I set the log level, but I still don't see much in the log:

Apr 14 18:14:29 duo dbus[3009]: [system] Successfully activated
service 'org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher'
Apr 14 18:14:29 duo nm-dispatcher: Dispatching action 'down' for wlan1
Apr 14 18:14:29 duo systemd[1]: Started Network Manager Script
Dispatcher Service.
Apr 14 18:14:29 duo systemd-sleep[6853]: Suspending system...
Apr 14 21:27:53 duo systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service watchdog
timeout (limit 1min)!
pavel@duo:~$ date
Sun Apr 15 12:26:32 CEST 2018
pavel@duo:~$

Is it possible that time handling accross suspend changed in v4.17?

I get some weird effects. With display backlight...

> > Where do I get the logs? I don't see much in the syslog...
> 
> > And.. It seems that it is "every other suspend". One resume results
> > in
> > broken network, one in working one, one in broken one...
> 
> Does your distro use pm-utils, upower, or systemd for suspend/resume
> handling?

upower, I guess:

pavel@duo:/data/l/linux$ ps aux | grep upower
root      3820  0.0  0.1  42848  7984 ?        Ssl  Apr14   0:01
/usr/lib/upower/upowerd

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)