netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 07/21] net/ipv6: Save route type in rt6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:20:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     dsahern@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...sch.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/21] net/ipv6: Save route type in rt6_info

From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:22:41 -0700

> @@ -2394,6 +2395,7 @@ static void addrconf_add_mroute(struct net_device *dev)
>  		.fc_ifindex = dev->ifindex,
>  		.fc_dst_len = 8,
>  		.fc_flags = RTF_UP,
> +		.fc_type = RTN_UNICAST,
>  		.fc_nlinfo.nl_net = dev_net(dev),
>  	};
>  

Multicast route is of type RTN_UNICAST?

All of these cases where passing in a zero initialized value of
fc_type up until this patch.  Perhaps you should discuss that in your
commit message a little bit.

Thanks.