[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180416123936.GH33938@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:39:36 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anjali Singhai Jain <anjali.singhai@...el.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SRIOV switchdev mode BoF minutes
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:01:16AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Samudrala, Sridhar
> <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > I meant between PFs on 2 compute nodes.
>
> If the PF serves as uplink rep, it functions as a switch port -- applications
> don't run on switch ports. One way to get apps to run on the host in switchdev
> mode is probe one of the VFs there.
>
>
> [...]
>
> > By smartnic env, i guess you are referring to OVS control plane also running
> > on the NIC.
>
> correct
>
Not just OvS, but other applications running on the SmartNIC could use tc for
programming hardware can benefit from a design like this.
> > I will look forward to your patches.
>
> FWIW, note that my patches don't bring any newz for you.. I am aligning
> mlx5 with what was agreed on netdev, e.g nfp does it (uplink rep and
> such) already.
Probably not major news from us either since this was discussed at the last
NetConf, but we are planning to have this option for SmartNICs or PCI-multihost
NICs, too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists