[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1b9ba17-8e7d-df49-5e83-ea3f2d84570a@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 19:05:56 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 2/5] ravb: correct ptp does failure after
suspend and resume
On 04/17/2018 01:05 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> @@ -2302,6 +2305,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused ravb_resume(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct net_device *ndev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = priv->pdev;
Could infer 'pdev' from 'dev' (avoiding the dereference)...
> Minor nit: I'd save this line...
>
>> + if (priv->chip_id != RCAR_GEN2)
>> + ravb_ptp_init(ndev, pdev);
>
> ... and use ravb_ptp_init(ndev, priv->pdev); here.
Agreed, no dire need for the new variable used only once.
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists