[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180417183736.GC9237@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:37:36 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, ebiggers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next v2] KEYS: DNS: limit the length of option
strings
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:24:37PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:23:40 -0700
>
> > Can you queue this up for stable too? syzbot has been hitting this on older
> > kernel versions.
>
> If you want a patch bound for stable, it must show up in Linus's tree
> first which means you should target 'net' rather than 'net-next'.
Okay, can you move the patch there, or do I need to resend, or is it too late
already? It's a clean cherry-pick. Sorry, I'm not too familiar with the quirks
of net and netdev -- most other maintainers do things differently.
Thanks,
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists