[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180417061550.GA21067@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:15:50 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: XDP performance regression due to CONFIG_RETPOLINE Spectre V2
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:07:04PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On X86 swiotlb fallback (via get_dma_ops -> get_arch_dma_ops) to use
> x86_swiotlb_dma_ops, instead of swiotlb_dma_ops. I also included that
> in below fix patch.
x86_swiotlb_dma_ops should not exist any mor, and x86 now uses
dma_direct_ops. Looks like you are applying it to an old kernel :)
> Performance improved to 8.9 Mpps from approx 6.5Mpps.
>
> (This was without my bulking for net_device->ndo_xdp_xmit, so that
> number should improve more).
What is the number for the otherwise comparable setup without repolines?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists