[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180418144818.0bcba1f9@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:48:18 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: "Nikita V. Shirokov" <tehnerd@...nerd.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller " <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: make generic xdp compatible w/
bpf_xdp_adjust_tail
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:29:42 -0700
"Nikita V. Shirokov" <tehnerd@...nerd.com> wrote:
> w/ bpf_xdp_adjust_tail helper xdp's data_end pointer could be changed as
> well (only "decrease" of pointer's location is going to be supported).
> changing of this pointer will change packet's size.
> for generic XDP we need to reflect this packet's length change by
> adjusting skb's tail pointer
>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
You are missing your own Signed-off-by: line on all of the patches.
BTW, thank you for working on this! It have been on my todo-list for a
while now!
_After_ this patchset, I would like to see adding support for
"increasing" the data_end location to create a larger packet. For that
we should likely add a data_hard_end pointer. This, would also be
helpful in cpu_map_build_skb() to know the data_hard_end, to determine
the frame size (as some driver doesn't use PAGE_SIZE frames, ixgbe).
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists