netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] net: bridge: multicast querier per VLAN support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180418085407.4f5723de@xeon-e3>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:54:07 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     Joachim Nilsson <troglobit@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: bridge: multicast querier per VLAN support

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:14:26 +0300
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:

> On 18/04/18 16:07, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:31:57PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:  
> >> On 18/04/18 15:07, Joachim Nilsson wrote:  
> >>> - First of all, is this patch useful to anyone  
> >> Obviously to us as it's based on our patch. :-)
> >> We actually recently discussed what will be needed to make it acceptable to upstream.  
> > 
> > Great! :)
> >   
> >>> - The current br_multicast.c is very complex.  The support for both IPv4
> >>>    and IPv6 is a no-brainer, but it also has #ifdef VLAN_FILTERING and
> >>>    'br->vlan_enabled' ... this has likely been discussed before, but if
> >>>    we could remove those code paths I believe what's left would be quite
> >>>    a bit easier to read and maintain.  
> >> br->vlan_enabled has a wrapper that can be used without ifdefs, as does br_vlan_find()
> >> so in short - you can remove the ifdefs and use the wrappers,  they'll degrade to always
> >> false/null when vlans are disabled.  
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll have a look at that and prepare an RFC v2!
> >   
> >>> - Many per-bridge specific multicast sysfs settings may need to have a
> >>>    corresponding per-VLAN setting, e.g. snooping, query_interval, etc.
> >>>    How should we go about that? (For status reporting I have a proposal)  
> >> We'll have to add more to the per-vlan context, but yes it has to happen.
> >> It will be only netlink interface for config/retrieval, no sysfs.  
> > 
> > Some settings are possible to do with sysfs, like multicast_query_interval
> > and ...  
> 
> We want to avoid sysfs in general, all of networking config and stats
> are moving to netlink. It is better controlled and structured for such
> changes, also provides nice interfaces for automatic  type checks etc.
> 
> Also (but a minor reason) there is no tree/entity in sysfs for the vlans
> where to add this. It will either have to be a file which does some
> format string hack (like us currently) or will need to add new tree for
> them which I'd really like to avoid for the bridge.

In general, all bridge attributes need to show in netlink and sysfs.
Sysfs is easier for scripting from languages.